US, Iran differ over nuclear inspections, Strait of Hormuz terms amid talks

US President Donald Trump claims that Iran had agreed to allow international inspections of its nuclear facilities for an indefinite period but Iranian officials denied that any such commitment had been made during negotiations

WASHINGTON/TEHRAN: (UrduPoint/UrduPoint / Pakistan Point News-June 24^th, 2026) The United States and Iran have offered conflicting interpretations of key provisions in their recently signed peace agreement, raising fresh uncertainty over the implementation of the deal intended to end months of hostilities between the two countries.

US President Donald Trump claimed that Iran had agreed to allow international inspections of its nuclear facilities for an indefinite period, describing the development as a major diplomatic achievement. However, Iranian officials denied that any such commitment had been made during negotiations, insisting that the country's nuclear programme was not part of the discussions and that no agreement had been reached on the return of international inspectors.

Despite the disagreement, Trump expressed confidence in the ongoing diplomatic process, saying relations between Washington and Tehran were improving and negotiations were progressing positively.

The dispute over nuclear inspections is one of several issues on which both sides have provided differing accounts. Washington and Tehran have also disagreed over the future use of Iranian assets frozen abroad, the management of the Strait of Hormuz, and arrangements related to regional conflicts.

Under the framework agreement signed last week, the two countries are expected to continue negotiations over the next 60 days to address unresolved matters, including Iran’s nuclear activities and broader security concerns.

In the United States, the agreement comes amid growing political debate over the conflict. The Senate voted 50-48 in favor of a resolution directing the administration to halt military action against Iran, following a similar vote in the House of Representatives earlier this month. Although the measure is largely symbolic, it reflects increasing concern among lawmakers over continued US involvement in the conflict.

Recent opinion polls have also indicated mixed public views on the war, with many Americans questioning whether the conflict has strengthened Washington’s position in the region.

<?php /*?> <?php */?>

Meanwhile, easing tensions have helped stabilize global energy markets. Oil prices continued to decline this week as fears of disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for international oil shipments, subsided.

Commercial shipping through the waterway has gradually resumed following the agreement. The International Maritime Organization and regional authorities are coordinating efforts to assist thousands of seafarers who were stranded during restrictions on maritime traffic.

Oman announced the establishment of a temporary shipping corridor through the Strait of Hormuz to facilitate safe navigation while discussions continue on long-term arrangements. Iranian and Omani officials have also begun consultations on the future management of the strategic waterway.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, during meetings with Gulf leaders, stressed that freedom of navigation must be maintained and indicated that Washington opposes any future tolls or restrictions on commercial vessels using the route.

Differences have also emerged regarding Iranian assets held overseas. Trump suggested that any funds released under the agreement would be used primarily for humanitarian purposes, while Iranian officials maintained that Tehran would decide independently how the money is spent.

Regional security issues remain another major point of contention. Iranian officials have argued that the agreement requires an Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon, while Israeli leaders have insisted their forces will remain in the area to address security concerns.

The disagreement comes as tensions continue along the Lebanon-Israel border despite renewed diplomatic efforts aimed at preserving a ceasefire.

While the agreement has reduced the immediate risk of further military escalation, significant gaps remain between Washington and Tehran on several key issues. Diplomatic efforts are expected to continue in the coming weeks as both sides seek to convert the preliminary framework into a comprehensive and lasting settlement.